MINUTES

Board of Trustees Retreat

August 12-13, 2005

 

 

In accordance with the terms and provisions of the Texas Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551 of Texas Government Code, the Board of Trustees of the Austin Community College District convened in public session on Friday, August 12, 2005, at 5:14 p.m. in the Conference Room of the Austin Area Urban League located at 1022 La Posada Drive, Austin, Texas 78752. with the following members present: Dr. Barbara P. Mink, Chair/Presiding Officer; Mr. John F. Hernandez; Board Vice Chair [arrived at 5:40 p.m.]; Mr. Jeffrey K. Richard, Secretary; Dr. Lillian J. Davis; Mr. Allen H. Kaplan; Ms. Nan McRaven; Mr. Rafael Quintanilla; and Ms. Veronica Rivera [arrived at 5:35 p.m.].  Trustee John Worley was absent from the meeting.  Also in attendance was Dr. Stephen B. Kinslow, College President.

 

It is further found and determined that in accordance with the policies and orders of this Board, the notice of this meeting has been posted and return thereof made pursuant to the terms and provisions of the Texas Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, and there has been full compliance with the terms and provisions of said act, including the timely posting of the subjects of this meeting.

 

ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION/POSSIBLE ACTION

 

Agenda Item 8103

Strengths and Goals:  Trustees

Dr. Barbara P. Mink, Board Chair, presented an overview for the Retreat and called attention to several activities to enhance openness and teamwork among Trustees and the President.  Trustees and Dr. Kinslow provided information regarding results of their Myers-Briggs Assessment.  Dr. Mink presented the Myers-Briggs Type Indicators and led a discussion regarding the indicators:

 

·        Energy:  Extraversion or Introversion (how each was energized; effects of each preference in work situations; and the checklist for extraverts and introverts).

·        Information:  Sensing or iNtuition (how each person takes in information; the effects of each preference in work situations; and the checklist for sensing types and intuitive types).

·        Decisions:  Thinking/Feeling (how decisions were made; the checklist for thinking types and feeling types).

·        Lifestyle:  Judging/Perceiving (approach to life--how each approached life; and the checklist for judging types and perceiving types).

 

Dr. Mink divided the group into three sub-groups and asked each Trustee to share information regarding the completed survey regarding exploration of individual preferences which best described themselves.  Each sub-group then reported back to the entire group on what they had learned about the individuals within their sub-group.

 

[Dinner was served at 6:30 p.m.]

 

The Trustees and President divided into 3 different sub-groups to discuss the questionnaires they had completed regarding Working Together as a Board/President Team.  Dr. Mink asked that the sub-groups provide summarized responses to items 1, 3, 4, and 5, and individual responses to 2 and 6:

 

1.      Some things I would really like us to accomplish this year (goals) are …

2.      I think some of the strengths that I bring to my role are …

3.      Some things I see as strengths of our President are …

4.      Some things I see as strengths of our Board (as a whole) are …

5.      Some things I would like us to do differently this year are …

6.      If I were to consider what I would like my “legacy” to be in my role, it would be …

 

Group A:

1. Annexations and a strategic facilities plan.  Additionally, the group identified a legislative plan as a consistent practice of relating decisions to Closing the Gap.

3.  Experience at ACC at all levels; good reputation; work ethic; willingness to make difficult

decisions.

4.  This Board has never been more diverse and has never had more respect for each other—just pervasively throughout, a very diverse set of opinions and very extensive respect for each       other.

5.  Talked about adding Committees.  The compromise would be Committees of the Whole where everyone could come if they were held; did not want subcommittees where three or four people would be focusing on facilities and then they would have to come back and start over with the rest—didn’t want that; a stipulation would be to have a very hard and fast sunset rule, if it’s not working, if it is not good; if it is taking staff time, and it is not producing anything, stop it; don’t just have them going on because we have one; would want to set up one for audit and one for facilities; want to get out more as we did with All-of-Austin when all were out speaking in meetings then, should not let that die, we are a better Board when we spend a considerable part of our time out, rather than inwardly focused.  When we start looking inwardly too much, we may lose our effectiveness.

 

Group B:

1. Would like a clear vision; a strategic plan for the service area; want a positive face for      being part of the economic development that goes on in this community—something the group did not think they had been a part of and should be; want to be the first choice for students considering higher education—meaning for ACC to be respected in the areas of instruction and programs, so want ACC to be a first choice; for annexations, group would like to move those issues forward in terms of Round Rock and San Marcos; a fund-raising development program, to look at the issue of single-member districts, and look at the whole ACC personnel system.

3. President is a very deliberate thinker and planner; carries through on commitments; takes time to get all of the facts; enjoys humor; funny; thorough knowledge of ACC; willingness to go the extra mile to meet with numerous groups and individuals and to be an active participant in the community—which the group thought was very important; has a lot of experience and diverse background

4.  Trustees are deeply passionate about the College; have a good knowledge about the community; members have varying skills, interests, and backgrounds; members are open to considering alternatives; and members are very active in the community—which is important.

5.  Group agreed they would like to streamline the meeting process; several ways this could be done—get questions answered beforehand; could be the President making a call to Trustees beforehand as some of the other Presidents have done—and that would be very helpful; or, Trustees have questions after reviewing the materials, could call the President and let him work that through with the Trustee beforehand; if the President gets several calls about the same question, then he should provide information at the meeting.  What the group did not want to happen was for one Trustee to get information that the rest of the Trustees did not have or that all might need; that is not what the group meant by streamlining the process, but it is the consensus that Trustees need information and somehow this needs to be done; perhaps Trustees need to look outside their area of expertise—if a Trustee is interested in one area, maybe it would behoove the Trustee and the College to look at some other area and become knowledgeable about another area; had some discussion as to whether it was really realistic for Trustees to expect to do that—and to push out of their area.  The group discussed tuition and perhaps Trustees could consider tuition increases a semester ahead of time to give some more lead time.

 

Group C:

1. Facilities master plan, deferred maintenance, general placement of future campuses, conducting a capital campaign, setting up scholarships, establishing teamwork between the administration/Board/staff

3.  Institutional history in different roles, establishing relationships and nurturing of those relationships, commitment to Austin area, ability to manage a large institution.

4.  Diversity and expertise of the Board, culturally diverse and very well balanced not just with ethnicity but also with age, women, men, and other; Board puts ACC first with a district-wide perspective; there is more trust among the Board members; they are committed and well networked.

5.  Have real work sessions instead of more work sessions, or have less work sessions and more community dialog; follow-up on items that have been postponed—track them better; have an updated time table—which is what happened this year—to adopt a budget by July; to have more of a “benefit of the doubt” by Trustees of the administration’s recommendations.

 

Trustees responded individually to (2) and cited strengths brought to the Board :

·        Strength comes from being on the Board so long, knowing the College, knowing the people, knowing the functions, understanding the mission of the Board, College and Foundation; second term on Foundation Board; connections in the community, especially the business community; credibility among the people who have supported me and  accessibility to them.

·        Knowledge of the higher education system; knowledge of what ACC’s mission is and what it is about and its place in the community; macro perspective.

·        Knowledge of economics and financial accounting, and relationships with corporate people; K-12 expertise;

·        Ability to analyze an issue and providing a compromise when coming up with a solution;

·        Openness, flexibility and clarity of ideas and opinions; sense of humor, like the big picture as well as I don’t miss the details, believe that I am prepared for meetings and on the issues; have a deep dedication to the mission of community colleges in general, but especially ACC; have a depth of understanding for higher education and a working knowledge of quite a range of businesses; understand education for an educational point of view but also a business point of view;

·        Having established and maintained deep relationships within ACC and across all levels of employees; being able to establish relationships within the service area that matter for ACC; good planner and organizer over the years at ACC as we have grown and coped with things and really limited resources at times; willingness to tackle tough issues; not afraid of conflict or difficult things.

·        Cut through lots of information and get to the principal issues.

·        Administrative experience, political connections, knowledge of the community, and a philosophy of caring.

·        Devotes time and energy to ACC.

 

Trustees responded individually to (6) and cited what they would like their legacy to be in their role:

·        To see the big picture on the Board and not be an advocacy for any one constituency but to see the whole budget and the whole College in trying to balance resources especially when they are scarce.

·        Assisted in growing the scholarship fund.

·        A regional college, financially strong, with a reputation for student success that is able to meet what is a spiraling and increasing demand for higher education.

·        We would have a significantly higher percentage of African American and Hispanic students in the College; that we have a higher percentage, as well as number, of students who complete, that we will have increased the taxing jurisdiction; an environment in which battles of the administration, faculty and staff become so rare that people will want to run for the Board, and it is not an after thought and so that it increases in pride and performance.

·        Facilitated the Board focusing their attention on the future of ACC and how the College can address the needs of our entire service area while also contributing to the College’s stability and to our processes being responsive and orderly; so I look out and I look in and that the meetings were professionally and fairly run and that open dialog was really fostered on all issues.

·        As a President who helped expand ACC’s resources—especially bringing Round Rock into the district; helping expand the role of the ACC Foundation; helping to improve the internal culture of ACC specifically in trying to have a shift to a more proactive orientation to issues and the life of the College instead of reactive.

·        Leave the institution financially viable and that provides an affordable education for all of Central Texas; would like the institution to have a more business approach, a more diverse work force and student body, and be more involved in the community; and like to establish a development/fund raising opportunity.

·        College to increase its enrollment significantly and retain more students.

·        Diligently worked to leverage existing capital in order to keep education affordable for students with limited resources.

 

Agenda Item 8104

President’s Goals

Dr. Kinslow called attention to the goals approved earlier for the College President:

 

College Priorities for President

(as approved by the Board of Trustees on March 7, 2005)

 

1.        Create a Clear Vision----A Strategic Master Plan 

2.        Encourage Annexation 

3.        Diversify the College Work Force 

4.        Complete Bond-Funded Facilities

5.        Increase Enrollment

6.        Be Influential with the State Legislature

7.        Involve Community More---Re-Format Board Work Sessions

8.        Conduct a Successful Referendum to Bring in All of City of Austin 

9.        Contain Cost of Education at ACC

10.    Have a Robust Scholarship Program

 

Dr. Kinslow cited the need for more specificity and expansion of the goals.  Trustees and President Kinslow discussed the goals and suggested additional items to be included in the goals for the President. 

 

Dr. Mink suggested that it would be appropriate for the Board to cluster and discuss the goals in greater detail at an upcoming Board meeting.

 

[Trustee Quintanilla left the meeting at 8:10 p.m.]

 

Dr. Mink highlighted discussions held at the Retreat and provided an overview of the activities for Saturday, August 13, 2005, 9 a.m.

 

RECESS

The Retreat of the Austin Community College Board of Trustees was recessed on Friday, August 12, 2005, at 8:14 p.m.

 

RECONVENE

The Board of Trustees of Austin Community College reconvened in public session at 9:00 a.m. on Saturday, August 13, 2005, pursuant to Government Code 551 with the following members present: Dr. Barbara P. Mink, Chair/Presiding Officer; Mr. John F. Hernandez; Board Vice Chair; Mr. Jeffrey K. Richard, Secretary; Dr. Lillian J. Davis; Mr. Allen H. Kaplan; Ms. Nan McRaven; Mr. Rafael Quintanilla; and Ms. Veronica Rivera.  Trustee John Worley was absent from the meeting.  Also in attendance was Dr. Stephen B. Kinslow, College President.

 

Dr. Mink and Trustees recapped information discussed at the Retreat on Friday, August 12.

 

Agenda Item 8105

Regional Overview

Dr. Mink introduced Ms. Sally Campbell, Executive Director of Envision Central Texas.  Ms. Campbell distributed information and commented regarding area development between 1990 and 2000 and called attention to anticipated growth within the next 10 years.  She reported on the regions fastest growing cities, 2000-2004; county growth projections; Central Texas growth trends; employment and population; industry sectors; wages and salaries, Central Texas workforce; solid job growth prediction; what Envision Central Texas is and why it was created; today’s suburban sprawl; consequences of sprawl; Envision Central Texas’ purpose; creating the vision; information from workshops; concept plans, various scenarios; integration of ACC campuses; sharing the vision; key elements for the vision; implementing the vision; and making the vision real.

 

Trustees expressed the need to ensure that all segments of the area were included in regional planning activities; requested representation from Austin Community College on the State Highway 130 Planning Committee; and cited a possible lack of understanding within the region regarding the amount of land required for planning future campuses of Austin Community College.

 

Mr. Jim Walker, ACC Coordinator, Office of Institutional Effectiveness, and member of the Envision Central Texas Board stated Envision Central Texas is about attitude and how individuals treat each other when discussing the future.

 

Trustees expressed appreciation to Ms. Campbell for the information provided.

 

RECESS

Dr. Mink recessed the Austin Community College Board of Trustees meeting at 9:47 a.m. on Saturday, August 12, 2005, for a short break.

 

RECONVENE

The Board of Trustees of Austin Community College reconvened in public session at 9:56 a.m. on Saturday, August 13, 2005, pursuant to Government Code 551.

 

Agenda Item 8106

ACC Service Area Planning

Dr. Kinslow provided information regarding the College’s work with Elgin, Bastrop, San Marcos, Kyle, Caldwell County, Manor, and Leander and the present location of ACC Centers.

 

Trustees discussed the need for additional information regarding the location of area growth, ACC Centers, school district areas, and the College’s current facilities master plan. 

 

Trustees discussed naming possibilities for the Austin Community College District, naming rights for Austin Community College facilities, displaying photographs of individuals within ACC facilities, and Board single-member districts.   Dr. Kinslow indicated that information regarding these topics would be included on the agenda for the September 6, 2005, Board meeting.

 

Executive Session

There was no Executive Session.

 

Announcements

Dr. Mink noted:

·        The first Public Hearing on the 2005 Tax Rate for Austin Community College would be held on Thursday, August 25, 2005, 12 noon, in the Board Room (201) of the Highland Business Center;

·        Austin Community College’s General Assembly would be held on Friday, August 26, at the Red Lion Hotel, Austin; and

·        The second Public Hearing on the 2005 Tax Rate for Austin Community College would be held during the September 6, 2005, Regular Board meeting.

 

Dr. Mink also encouraged Trustees to participate in the “Welcome Back Bashes” scheduled by the ACC Student Life Office.

 

Adjournment

Having no motion before the Board, the August 12-13, 2005, Retreat of the Austin Community College Board of Trustees was adjourned at 11:43 a.m. on Saturday, August 13, 2005.

 

Approved By          

Jeffrey Richard, Secretary