Textbook for American Surveys
Texas Revolution &
History sheds some interesting light on the controversial border between Mexico and the American Southwest. It's important to understand this history as we deal with issues like immigration, language and labor across the entire country. The U.S. signed the Adams-Onís Treaty in 1819, whereby Spain granted Florida (that Andrew Jackson had already invaded anyway) to the U.S., and the U.S. promised to never take the area south of the Red River (Texas). What's now central Texas was called Nuevas Filipinas, or the New Philippines. It was a handy treaty because Spain then ceded independence to Mexico in 1821, and the U.S. didn’t feel it had to abide by the Texas promise since Mexico wasn’t the country it signed the treaty with. Regardless, Mexico encouraged American settlement in its northeastern-most state, renamed Tejas, to further populate and develop the area, granting land to Americans. The early Mexican government was beholden to free trade ideals and wanted to encourage trade with the U.S. It also wanted a buffer of settlers separating its valuable mines to the south from Apache and Comanche invaders who controlled the northern part of the country.
of these land grants from Mexico were called empresarios, among whom the most famous and important
were Moses Austin and son, Stephen (left). Empresarios
would learn Spanish and pay the Mexican government around $30 U.S. dollars
(~$700 today) after 6 years if they successfully developed
the land. They parceled out their land, in turn, to other settlers, in the Austins' case the Old Three Hundred between 1822 and 1828.
Stephen F. Austin appreciated Mexico’s generosity and encouraged his fellow settlers to learn Spanish and serve in the Mexican military. Most of the Americans didn’t come to acculturate as Mexicans, though, but rather to Americanize the region. It was the height of the Jacksonian Era, and the U.S. was bursting at the seams with ambitions of western migration. East Texas defined the western boundary of King Cotton. Many of the settlers were cotton planters who brought a dedication to states’ rights with them; only now, the national power in question was Mexico’s. Mexico abolished slavery in 1829, and made Catholicism their state religion -- both affronts to slaveholding Protestants accustomed to religious freedom. To tame the independent-minded gringos, Mexico quit giving away land and tried to cut off immigration from the U.S. in 1830, but it was too late.
tension, Mexico experienced a counter-revolution in its
early history, with a dictatorship run by General Antonio Lopez de
replacing its original republican format. Mexico's early
political history was chaotic, with 14 men serving as
president between 1824 and '44. Tejas governor José Antonio Navarro was an enemy of Santa Anna’s because
Santa Anna sided with Spanish Loyalists during Mexico’s long
struggle for independence from 1811-1821, and plundered San Antonio de Bexar in 1813. As relations worsened, the
diplomatic Austin served as a go-between, lobbying the
central government to at least separate Tejas as a single
independent state from its neighbor to the southwest, Coahuila. The two were originally bound together
as a double state, Coahuila y Tejas (flag, right). Meanwhile
Austin encouraged the white Texians
(or Texicans, or Texonians) to honor their Mexican
citizenship. But just as the British lost a key ally
and supporter in Benjamin Franklin by castigating him after
the Tea Party, so too the Mexicans alienated their biggest
American ally, Austin, by jailing him in Mexico City. The
man who once championed Mexican citizenship picked up works
on the English Revolution of 1688 and decline of the Roman
Empire in a New Orleans bookstore on his way home.
Tejas was one part of a broader-based rebellion against the increasingly authoritarian Mexican government (click to expand on the map, right). The Texians grew unruly, seizing fortifications and the "come and take it" cannon at Gonzales, and surrounding the missionary-turned-presidio [fort] in San Antonio known as El Alamo in 1835. They allowed the trapped Mexican soldiers to escape, but declared independent statehood within Mexico. They also took the other key fort in the state, Presidio La Bahía in Goliad.
Santa Anna returned the following spring, 1836, flying a red flag of no quarter and aiming to put the Texians in their place. The Mexican Army band signified their take-no-prisoners, "slit their throats" policy by playing El Degüello. Two main roads led into Texas: one through Goliad near the Gulf Coast, and the other through San Antonio de Bexar defended by the Alamo. The white troops awaiting Santa Anna in the spring of 1836 were not just empresarios; they included Americans from all over who had followed the story in newspapers that winter. They described Catholic Mexicans as "tyrannical butchers in the service of the Pope." W.B. Travis was an Alabama slaveholder, Jim Bowie was on the run from the law, and Tennessean Davy Crockett (left) was a former U.S. Senator looking to re-establish himself politically. Crockett was a frontier politician in the Jacksonian mold, famous for killing copious bears. But he broke with Old Hickory over the expulsion of eastern Indians, opposing what came to be known as the Trail of Tears. Upon arriving in Tejas, he agreed to serve in the militia to qualify for free land. This was as much an American as Texian fight. The story unfolded just as America was starting to look west beyond the Mississippi and embrace Manifest Destiny, and just as steam-powered presses increased papers' circulation.
Tejanos were also in the Alamo -- Mexican states-righters, in this case, who allied themselves with white rebels. Tejanos were the early advocates of American immigration to develop the northern economy, and supported slavery. There were also centralist supporters of Santa Anna in Tejas, especially in the southeast around Victoria. Early Hollywood renditions of the Alamo story, including D.W. Griffith's Martyrs of the Alamo (1915) and John Wayne’s definitive 1960 version (left), bleached scenes to avoid confusing or angering white audiences. But it wasn’t just white Americans vs. Hispanics, it was Mexicans vs. rebellious Hispanic and Anglo Mexicans (free Blacks also fought for independence, but not in the second Alamo fight). Had the Tejanos been in charge of military strategy, they likely would've followed their normal pattern of just evacuating the area until Mexican forces left. That sort of mobility had kept them alive during the fighting between Spanish and Mexican forces in the 1810s, and was a primary motive in their keeping livestock rather than growing crops. They thought defending forts trapped the defenders inside, which is exactly what happened when the rebels entrenched in the Alamo.
Santa Anna’s forces surrounded the fort and the rebels fought heroically but lost after a 13-day siege, highlighted by a climactic 90-minute battle. According to the memoir of soldado José Enrique de la Peña, our most reliable primary source relating to the event, a few straggled out toward the end and were killed, though Santa Anna spared the women, children and slaves, and sent them off with cash and blankets. Most historians think Davy Crockett was among those stragglers, though de la Peña didn't know who Crockett was and didn't revise his account to include the Tennessean until he read later reports in Detroit and New York newspapers. A Mexican soldier took the six white male prisoners to Santa Anna, who asked (in Spanish) "have I not told you before how to dispose of them?" Several soldiers plunged their swords into Crockett, including some into his heart as he lunged desperately toward Santa Anna before dying with an indignant, defiant look on his face. One of the reasons the story didn’t gain traction, despite its probable accuracy, is that it doesn’t make either side look good. It dilutes the everyone-went down-fighting version of the American story, and makes Santa Anna seem merciless. Generally, we shift our history around a bit here and there until it sounds like a story we want to hear. The mythologized version was especially important to Texans' identity that the Anglos fought until the last man standing after Mexican immigration began to pick up in Texas in the 1910s. In any event, at least most of the people in the Alamo fought to the death.
Army to the east, led by Sam Houston, cut their losses and abandoned those in
the Alamo in order to fight another day. In the last entry
to his diary, the resentful Travis wrote, “our bones will
reproach our fellow countrymen for their neglect.” In his
defense, Houston had ordered the San Antonio area evacuated,
because he knew it would be impossible to defend, so the men
who chose to stay behind were defying his orders. Houston
just sent them to the Alamo to retrieve the ammo and destroy
the fort, but they chose to defend it. Houston hoped they
would haul the cannons to Goliad, which was a more strategic
spot. Why Bowie and the other stayed has always been a bit
of a mystery, and some researchers theorize that Bowie might
have been protecting buried silver under the Alamo from the
Sabá Mine in the Hill Country west of town. Bowie had
famously fought off Indians hunting for the mine in 1831,
with a story appearing two years later in the Saturday
Evening Post. Archeologists even dug up some ground
under the Alamo in 1995 looking for the treasure, but didn't
find it. In any event, around thirty men finally made
their way from Gonzales to San Antonio for relief in 1836,
but it wasn't enough. At least Houston’s men could cash in
on the victims' martyrdom with one of the most famous
rallying cries in history, Remember the Alamo. The Battle of the Alamo was one of the most famous in American
history, partly because it symbolized fight-to-the-death
heroics, and partly because it suggested Americans were the
victims rather than the aggressors in settling the frontier.
Likewise, the other famous battle in western history was Little Bighorn, or Custer’s Last Stand. In that case,
Indians rather than Mexicans wiped out Whites.
Things didn’t go any better (worse in fact) at Goliad, where Mexicans slaughtered 342 of the fort’s defenders after they surrendered at nearby Coleto Creek, including their leader Colonel James Fannin. Even more would've died if not for the intervention of Francita Alavez, the "Angel of Goliad," who snuck some out of the fort and persuaded the Mexicans to treat others humanely. The remaining Texian settlers hastily packed whatever they could and high-tailed it for the Louisiana border in the great Runaway Scrape. One advantage of such a scenario is that the pursuer never expects the pursued to turn back into them.
That’s what Houston and his army did, sneaking up on Santa Anna’s forces at San Jacinto, a swampy area near present-day Houston, rudely attacking them during their fiesta. According to legend, the general himself was predisposed with a practitioner of the world’s oldest profession – an indentured servant named Emily West who came to be known as the Yellow Rose of Texas. Houston sent Emily into the Mexican camp, and she was freed after accomplishing her mission. Other Mexican soldiers were with soldaderas (female soldiers or camp followers) when the Texians attacked. Santa Anna was still fumbling with his trousers when they came out of nowhere, routing and brutalizing his troops in about twenty minutes. Tejanos like Juan Seguín (left) wore tags on their hats to avoid being killed by friendly fire, and one of the best accounts of the battle was chronicled by patriot José Antonio Menchaca.
Houston's forces had destroyed the main bridge out of the bayou, making it impossible for Santa Anna's men to escape. Most of the Mexican forces were actually elsewhere and remained intact to still outnumber the Texians. Santa Anna ordered the rest to San Antonio and Victoria to regroup. But, as they retreated to a defensive position between the San Bernard and West Bernard Rivers, they bogged down in what they called the Sea of Mud (El Mar de Lodo), leading to infighting between Generals Vicente Filisola and José de Urrea.
One could say that torrential rains played a big part in helping Texas gain its independence when it did. Santa Anna reluctantly signed off on Texas independence from Mexico in the Treaty of Velasco. The victors nicknamed their new country the Lone Star Republic because they could now take down the double-starred Coahuila y Tejas flag and replace it with their own single-starred red-white-and-blue national flag of Texas (below). Santa Anna later claimed he’d only ceded the area as far south as the Nueces River, rather than the Rio Grande, an important distinction because the Rio Grande River was the main artery connecting the Santa Fe and Rocky Mountain fur trade to Europe.
President Sam Houston (right), the new Republic of Texas (1836-45) expected annexation to the
United States, but its admission as a state quickly bogged
down in the brewing sectional crisis over slavery, and
concerns over its debt. Former president John Quincy Adams
led the opposition. Texas would throw off the balance
between northern and southern states, especially if it could
sub-divide into five smaller states, which its constitution
did in fact allow when it finally became a state in 1845.
In the meantime, Houston fended off (and courted) offers for colonization from France and England, while the country filled up with Americans. As they gained critical mass, the new arrivals had no appreciation for Tejanos’ participation in the revolution, or their dignity as humans, for that matter. They disenfranchised Hispanics and took their land, just as 49'ers would in California. As the saying went, “If a Mexican won’t sell you his land, his widow will.” Sequín (left), who was elected senator in the new republic and later mayor of San Antonio, had to flee to Mexico in 1842.
Some argue that, in a way, the story of Texas represents the triumph of illegal immigration; only the immigration they're talking about is from the U.S., not vice-versa. It would more accurate, along those lines of thinking, to argue that it was the triumph of legal and illegal immigration, since Mexico's policy vacillated between allowing and barring American immigration. The key in either case is the amount of people, whether legal or illegal, and the important thing is whether the racially dominant group uses its power to promote democracy or a discriminatory caste system.
Slavery wasn't just controversial in the potential new state of Texas. Its extension was so divisive that, during the 1844 presidential election, front-runners like Martin Van Buren and Henry Clay were hesitant to talk about it at all. That left an opening for dark horse candidate James Polk (right) of Tennessee to emerge from the pack by promising both the North and South geographical prizes: Texas (and potentially the rest of the Southwest) would come in as slave territory, and Polk supported U.S. claims on Oregon as potential Free Soil territory.
The U.S. and Britain shared the Oregon Country (left, click to enlarge), which then stretched up to the 54º40' parallel to include present-day British Columbia, per an 1816 agreement set to expire in 1846. Polk presumed the British wouldn’t be interested in defending such a remote territory with no Atlantic access. But the British called Polk out on his Bluff and Bluster strategy of promising 54º40' or Fight! They correctly guessed that Polk’s real ambition was to conquer Mexico and spread slavery, so they figured he didn’t want two wars at once. He quickly settled on halfsies, with Oregon divided along the 49th parallel -- the same straight line extending from Minnesota west. The Brits also wanted the line curved downward at the end to include all of Vancouver Island, and Polk again complied. Suffice it say, Northerners weren’t happy. From their view, they didn’t understand why the Oregon Boundary Dispute wasn’t the Oregon War, when Polk seemed intent on gearing up for a real one with Mexico.
rightly suspected, Polk was more dedicated to the cause of
spreading slavery into the Southwest than he was tussling
with the Brits over some Douglas Firs and salmon. And he
coveted the deepwater port of San Francisco in northern
California, as did the English and French. But Texas was the
top priority. After William Henry Harrison died from
pneumonia shortly into his presidency in 1841, his VP John Tyler
(the other half of Tippecanoe & Tyler, Too)
dedicated himself to acquiring Texas for the U.S. It finally
happened toward the very end of his administration, but
Mexico never relinquished its claim on Texas, even after
Santa Anna's loss at San Jacinto. The U.S. annexed Texas as
a state in 1845 and Polk moved to solidify American claims
on the upper half of Mexico.
Similar to its inconsistent trade policies in lower Tejas, Mexico variously welcomed then banned American trade in Santa Fe. The area was a key nexus for furs, turquoise, blankets and silver during the Rocky Mountain trade era of the 1820s and 30’s, and Americans defined it as being in far western Texas. By the 1840s, it was too late to divert economic traffic along a north-south axis toward Mexico City. Santa Fe was Americanizing, regardless of who its official ruler was, as was California, especially after establishment of the Old Spanish Trail connecting Santa Fe to Los Angeles (click to enlarge map on left). In 1846, California underwent a sped up version of the Texas independence movement called the Bear Flag Revolt, this one also launched by an alliance of Whites but opposed by most Californios, especially those in Los Angeles and San Diego. The white Bear Flag rebels were already squatting on their land by that point, so there was never the early alliance enjoyed by Texians and Tejanos, though an earlier generation of white merchants from the East Coast had assimilated in the 1830s.
President Polk offered to buy the upper half of Mexico for $30 million, the part that really interested the U.S. However, Mexico refused diplomat James Slidell’s proposal and another $3.75 million to settle the Rio Grande/Nueces dispute in Texas. Polk either feigned outrage or was genuinely upset at the show of disrespect. Slidell’s Rebuff was Polk's justification for a declaration of war against Mexico. But Mexico refusing to sell half of itself to the U.S. probably wasn’t the firmest grounds ever for war, even Polk realized, so he had American troops stir up an incident between the contested Nueces and Rio Grande rivers, which was then tacked onto the message. Polk ordered General Zachary Taylor to march south of the Nueces from Corpus Christi and build Fort Texas across the Rio Grande from Matamoros, Mexico. Mexico took the bait and ambushed Taylor's dragoons (mounted cavalry), shedding "American blood on American soil" as Polk wrote in his war declaration. Ulysses S. Grant, later a famous general in the Civil War, was involved. As he put it, "We were sent to provoke a fight, but it was essential that Mexico commence it." Manufacturing incidents is a subtle art that one has to appreciate when well executed, but not everyone bought this one. Young Whig congressman Abraham Lincoln attached riders to all his bills questioning whether the area between the rivers was really even American to start with. They became known as Lincoln’s Spot Resolutions, and were virtually the only thing he was known for nationally prior to running for the Illinois state senate in 1858. John Quincy Adams, ex-president, said the coming war was for "slave owners and slave breeders," pure and simple. Henry David Thoreau authored his famous essay Civil Disobedience partly to protest the war. But Congress voted overwhelmingly in favor of Polk's declaration.
easily took control of present-day New Mexico, Arizona and
California in the first year of the Mexican
Map Mexico had invaded Texas during its nine-year stint
as a nation, but the U.S. solidified its claim on Texas in
the first year as well, with Taylor winning two battles
along the border at Palo
Alto and Resaca de la Palma. The tougher part of the
war was the southern half of Mexico. The U.S. sent one
invasionary force led by Zachary
Taylor south from Texas toward Monterrey, while a
second led by Winfield
Scott landed on the coast at Veracruz (left). Both moved toward
Mexico City despite stiff resistance and struggles with
guerilla fighters, malaria, dysentery and "black vomit" (the
bloody discharge associated with malaria). American troops
were outnumbered in almost every battle, but their troops
were well trained, and they had superior artillery
(cannons). The Mexican military was antiquated, inefficient
and over-staffed, but fought hard to protect its homeland.
The Mexican government changed hands throughout the war, at various points evaporating altogether. Taylor's troops conquered Monterrey, but agreed to an armistice and allowed the Mexican troops to escape. Then Mexico's exiled leader, our old friend Santa Anna, approached the U.S. with an offer. If they would agree to smuggle him back into the country, he would settle on terms generous to the U.S. They complied and the Cat with Nine Lives [Santa Anna] reneged on the deal, brazenly demanding Taylor’s immediate surrender. Taylor (right) exhibited an admirable economy of language in his three-word reply: "Go to Hell." By now, Polk wanted to rein in Taylor some and allow Winfield Scott to catch up, and not just for tactical reasons. There was a pattern of successful generals ending up in the White House -- Washington, then Old Hickory Jackson, Old Tippecanoe Harrison, and now Old Rough-n-Ready Taylor threatened to make it four, three with Old nicknames. The easygoing Taylor was popular among his men, and he didn't hide his ambition to become president. As it turns out, Polk didn’t run for a second term, and Zach Taylor sure enough won the 1848 election. That suited Polk well enough, since he eventually decided he preferred Taylor to the other prominent general, Old Fuss-n-Feathers Winfield Scott, and it seemed that whomever emerged as the war's biggest hero would be the next president.
bombing the coastal city of Vera Cruz from the sea, Scott
made an amphibious landing and moved west, while Taylor
defeated Santa Anna's forces in the north at the battle of Buena
Vista. Scott won the race to the capital through
mountains and jungles aided by a brilliant engineer and
E. Lee. After the climactic Battle
of Chapultepec outside Mexico City, one of Santa
Anna's officers purportedly muttered that "God was a
Yankee." By the time U.S. forces got into the city (left),
the government had crumbled and it was unclear whom to
negotiate with. In fact, it wasn’t clear who
should do the negotiating for the U.S. either, because Polk
had already fired Nicholas
Trist (right), the diplomat on task traveling with the
army. It seems that Trist’s final act of insubordination was
to delay his own firing with a 65-page counter-proposal. As
a non-employee of the U.S. government, he wrote up the
treaty to end the Mexican War, the Treaty of Guadalupe
Hidalgo, signed by
people who didn’t really run Mexico. Under these
circumstances, Congress didn’t have to sign a treaty allowing
Mexico to retain the bottom 45% of their country but, then
again, Congress doesn’t have to sign any treaty. This
feature of the U.S. Constitution makes it difficult and
confusing for other countries to end wars with the
The U.S. fought hard for two years to conquer the bottom half, but now didn’t seem to want it. Americans debated on Capital Hill and in the newspapers, and determined that Mexico had too many non-WASPs (white Anglo-Saxon Protestants) for their liking, though they didn't use that acronym. The "All of Mexico" movement also would've encountered fierce resistance from the Mexican population, who was already fighting a guerilla war against American troops. The U.S. took the upper 55% and paid Mexico $15 million – half what Slidell offered Mexico earlier for the same thing. Many Americans were baffled as to why the U.S. would pay anything for territory they just conquered, but the settlement at least put a better spin on what was basically a war of naked conquest. But adding insult to injury, Americans found gold in northern California just as the war was ending, worth far more than the Guadalupe settlement. U.S. Grant, who was not only a future Civil War general but also a two-term president, wrote in his Memoirs that he regarded the Mexican war as "one of the most unjust ever waged by a stronger against a weaker nation."
Like the War of 1812, the U.S.-Mexican War of 1846-48 was sectionally divisive, with Northerners (especially Whigs) skeptical of the war’s aims. However, unlike the War of 1812, the Mexican conflict failed to unify Americans upon its conclusion. Ironically, it caused more unity in Mexico, where despite the loss the war forged a sense of Mexican nationalism. But even in the first year of the three-year war, U.S. politicians argued over how to divide the Mexican Cession (below). The Democrats had always been unified north and south on supporting slavery, but now cracks began to show. Northern Democrat David Wilmot (PA) introduced legislation in the House to ban slavery in the Mexican Cession, signaling that party’s ultimate fracturing along regional lines, even though his bill failed in the Senate. From the Mexican War on, Americans argued for the next fifteen years over whether or not to extend slavery into new western territories, precipitating the Civil War. Names later made famous by that war – U.S. Grant, George McClellan, Robert E. Lee (right) and others – met at West Point and fought together in Mexico, but ended up on opposite sides in the Civil War. As South Carolina Senator John C. Calhoun presciently put it at the time, "Mexico is our forbidden fruit."
Optional 15-Minute Podcast: Miguel Levario (Texas Tech), Mexican Migration to the U.S.