Évaluation de rédaction, 100 point rubric for composition
|
10-11 |
12-13 |
14-15 |
16-17 |
18-20 |
|
|
Content / 20 |
no preparation of topic shown |
adequate but skimpy preparation, little forethought given to task |
good research but not enough detail, some preparation is clear |
detailed and good research, preparation for writing obvious |
excellent research and interesting details |
|
10-11 |
12-13 |
14-15 |
16-17 |
18-20 |
|
|
Organization / 20 |
inappropriate or unintelligible no double-spacing |
hard to follow; no double spacing or paragraphing; inadequate length |
one paragraph, but development of main idea confused, double-spaced |
good evidence of structure in paragraphs; main idea clear; double-spaced |
well organized by paragraphs, main ideas clear and interesting, double-spaced |
|
10-11 |
12-13 |
14-15 |
16-17 |
18-20 |
|
|
Vocabulary
/ 20 |
below level of proficiency, use of non target language |
meaning obscured by inadequate vocabulary; many misspellings and accents missing; use of non-target language |
adequate, but sometimes repetitive or not varied enough; not many misspellings or accents missing, no use of non-target language |
wide range of vocabulary, few misspellings; few accents missing, no use of non-target language |
varied, surprising, and used appropriately; an occasional accent missing, no use of non-target language |
|
14-19 |
20-24 |
25-29 |
30-34 |
35-40 |
|
|
Structures
/ 40 |
words are put in non-target language syntax rather than French |
most structures show direct transfer from non-target language, few are authentic French structures, difficult to derive meaning |
some structures show direct transfer from non-target language, others are authentic French structures, meaning is derivable |
some structural errors but overall the structures are authentic French idiom, meaning is clear |
excellent control and varied use of forms (verbs and idioms); interesting |
Total = / 100 Nom _______________________________
90 - 100 A 80 - 89 B 70 - 79 C 60 - 69 D