Evaluation

• Overview
• Administrative Performance of Adjuncts
• Input Forms
• Instructional Performance
• Portfolios
• Professional Development
• Professional Service
• Responsibilities of Full-time and Adjunct Faculty
• Responsibilities of Department Chair
• Responsibilities of Instructional Dean
• Student Evaluation of Faculty
• Use of Evaluations in Eligibility Lists

Overview

With guidance from the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS), and as specified in Board Policies F-4 and F-7, the full-time and adjunct faculty of Austin Community College are evaluated by both their students and their supervisors on a regular basis. These evaluations are intended to provide feedback to faculty on the effectiveness of their classroom instruction and aid in the development of their Professional Development plans. Currently, student evaluations for all faculty are conducted in the fall semester; however, those faculty who are new hires after the fall semester are evaluated in the spring semester. Optional spring semester evaluations for all others are available on request. In addition, any supervisor may request an evaluation for a faculty member in their area.

For more information on the faculty evaluation cycle and criteria for both full-time and adjunct faculty, visit http://www.austincc.edu/hr/eval/.
Read full board policies at http://www.austincc.edu/board/policies/F4.htm and http://www.austincc.edu/board/policies/F7.htm.

Administrative Performance of Adjuncts

Adjunct faculty are evaluated on their compliance with ACC policy and procedures as outlined in the Faculty Evaluation Procedures Manual.

Input Forms

As part of the Faculty Evaluation process, input forms are utilized to collect and review information. Using the "Faculty Input Form" instructors can respond to student evaluations and input information about instructional and non-instructional activities. Department Chairs and other supervisors can provide information about faculty performance by using the "Administrative Input Form" and "Instructional Input Form."

For more information on the Faculty Input, Administrative Input, or Instructional Input Forms, view the Faculty Evaluation Procedures Manual.

Instructional Performance

Instructional Performance is a review based on a combination of instructional material from portfolios, input forms, student evaluation and Grade Distribution Report from the previous semester. For more information, visit the Faculty Evaluation Procedures Manual.

Portfolios

In addition to student evaluations, full-time and adjunct faculty member's instructional performance will be evaluated through portfolios. The creation of a portfolio will help faculty assess their own efforts at effective instruction. Portfolios are due November 1 of the academic year.

For more information about portfolios, view the Portfolio Process online.

Professional Development

Austin Community College supports and encourages its faculty to participate in professional development activities. An objective of professional development is to enhance faculty-teaching skills and increase faculty discipline knowledge. For more information about professional development opportunities visit http://www.austincc.edu/hr/profdev/.

Professional Service

Professional Service is an element of the evaluation process that is required for full-time instructors and optional for adjunct instructors. It is a review of a wide range of non-teaching duties listed in the Faculty Evaluation Procedures Manual.

Responsibilities of Full-time and Adjunct Faculty

The following steps are required by all faculty members to complete the evaluation process:

1. Receive student evaluation packets
2. Select a student monitor
3. Give materials to student monitor
4. Conduct the Student Evaluations
5. Receive the Student Evaluation Results
6. Send Copies of the Faculty Evaluation Portfolio to the Department Chair
7. Complete the Online Faculty Input Form
8. Review and Sign the Faculty Evaluation Summary Form
9. If a review is requested, make arrangements to first meet with the Department Chair to review the faculty evaluation.
10. If further review is needed, make arrangements to meet with the Dean to review the faculty evaluation.
11. Receive a copy of the completed Full-time/Adjunct Classroom Faculty Summary Form

Some aspects of the evaluation process may differ depending upon the current status of each faculty member. Please consult the Faculty and Staff Evaluation web page at http://www.austincc.edu/hr/profdev for current information regarding the complete faculty evaluation process, portfolio requirements for each discipline, input forms, deadlines, and other up to date information.

Responsibilities of Department Chair

Department Chairs play a critical role in the evaluation process. They are responsible for the following steps:

1. Receive the student evaluation report packets, Faculty Rating Reports, and Grade Distribution Reports
2. Receive copies of the instructional material from all faculty members
3. Retrieve the online Faculty Input Forms
4. Perform the Instructional Evaluation and complete the Instructional Input Forms
5. Complete or receive Instructional Input Forms
6. Review the Evaluation Summary Form for each faculty member
7. Send the Faculty Evaluation Summary forms to the appropriate Dean

Responsibilities of Instructional Dean

Instructional Deans also play a role in the evaluation process. They are responsible for the following steps:

1. Receive the completed evaluation summary form
2. Send the summary form to the appropriate faculty member for signature
3. Receive signed summary forms from instructors
4. If no request for conference, sign and distribute the summary form
5. If a conference is requested, send form to Department Chair
6. After conference, receive form from the Department Chair
7. If no request for conference with Dean is indicated, sign and distribute the summary form
8. If a conference with the Dean is requested, schedule conference
9. After the conference, record any comments then sign and distribute the summary form

Student Evaluation of Faculty

In the Fall term, students complete their evaluation materials in-class, or as described below, according to a calendar set by the Faculty Evaluation office. A Student Monitor is responsible for returning the evaluation materials to the campus administrative office. Students in the Early College Start program also complete their evaluations in-class with a student monitor at their site. Students who participate in distance learning courses complete their evaluations at campus Testing Centers. Each mode of evaluation follows a specific process that is detailed in the Faculty Evaluation Procedures Manual.

Use of Evaluations in Eligibility Lists

Information made available through the faculty evaluation process will be used by Department Chairs when making eligibility list placements.

Members of the Adjunct Faculty whose summary teaching evaluations, when last evaluated, were very good or excellent in all categories and who recSeive an acceptable evaluation with respoect to administrative procedures may be considered for the HPTH designation.

Exclusion from an eligibility list may occur due to low aggregate score, unacceptable results in the professional evaluation rating, a serious problem or reported incident, a violation of federal or state law or a significant classroom performance problem identified by the Department Chair.

Related Administrative Rule: 4.06.001 Qualitative Distinctions on Eligibility Lists

back to top