|
Structural Functionalism |
Conflict Theory |
Symbolic Interaction |
Comparative |
Nature of society |
Interrelated social structures fit together to form functional whole |
Competing interest groups, with each seeking to secure to its own ends at expense of others |
Individuals interacting to build groups. We use symbols to think, do, and communicate |
|
Basis of interaction |
Consensus and shared values |
Conflict, power, constraint |
Shared meanings regarding symbols |
|
Focus on inquiry |
Maintenance of society, social order and functions of parts |
Social change and conflict |
Development of self and adaptation to society |
|
Level of analysis |
Macro/social structure |
Macro/social structure |
Micro/interpersonal interaction |
|
Proponents |
Talcott Parson Robert Merton Emile Durkheim |
Karl Marx Ralf Dahrendorf Edwin Sutherland Howard Becker |
Charles Horton Cooley George Herbert Mead Herbert Blumer Simmel |
Max Weber |
THEORY defn: a set of interrelated statements about reality, usually involving one or more cause and effect relationships.
A set of interrelated (falsifiable and ideally verifiable) hypotheses for testing.
The word “theory” in common use normally means an abstract thought or general explanations or even conjecture. In science in general the word “theory” means a plausible or scientifically acceptable general principles offered to explain observed fact. I prefer an even more strict usage in Sociology. When I use the term “Sociological Theory” I mean a formal set of verifiable and falsifiable hypotheses that build upon one another.
Given that usage, these categories are not theories, as some would see it, but rather theoretical perspectives. They are the three broad categories into which we put theories and theorizations.